The 220 Channel Challenge

Which receiver is better? The Trimble R8 GNSS, or the Trimble SPS882?


Updated February 2017

 

At Positioning Solutions, We receive a lot of questions regarding the differences between the two receivers, so we decided to put them to the test to determine which is the most advanced receiver on the market.

 

Construction or Survey?

To get an understating why Trimble has produced two different GNSS receivers, we need to understand that there are two separate groups within Trimble. The Survey/ Geospatial group and the Construction - Heavy Civil group.  The purpose of dividing the two markets is to provide better focus on the individual needs of their customers.   The focus started with the controller software.  Most surveyors that use Trimble products are familiar with Survey Controller software and have formal education in surveying.   However, with the popularity of GPS growing in early 2000, Trimble realized that there was a demand for GPS for the non-surveyor, so they developed an easier to use software called SCS900 (Site Controller Software) for the Construction market.  As the popularity of GPS and SCS900 grew, Trimble decided to divide the two groups with the purpose of developing products that better meet their customer’s needs.

 

Datasheet Review

We started with the datasheets provided on Trimbles website www.trimble.com Both receivers use Trimble's Maxwell 6 chip's and have 220 channels allowing both receivers to track and provide corrections for up to 44 satellites. Per the datasheets, both receivers list the same shock, vibration, and IP67 ratings. Both have Bluetooth, Lemo and serial ports for comminication. There is a 5 mm difference listed in vertical accuracy and 2 mm in horizontal, but baseline lengths are not mentioned on either datasheet - which is the most likely reason for the difference. Both receivers list; 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 Hz positioning capability as well as CMR+, CMRx, RTCM 2.1, RTCM 2.3, RTCM 3.0, RTCM 3.1 input and output protocols.

Both receivers are VRS capable and both have 57MB of internal data storage (for static survey). And both receivers, according to Trimble’s literature, are “committed to the next generation of modernized GNSS configurations by providing Galileo-compatible products, well in advance of Galileo system availability”. So what gives? What is the difference?

 

Trimble SPS882 Specifications

REAL-TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) POSITIONING

SPS882 Datasheet

SPS882 Notes:

The SPS882 is a familiar design that utilizes the same housing and radome as the older R8 Model 2, trading the light grey color for yellow. According to the datasheets, the SPS882 lists the same Maxwell 6 chipset, but slightly better RTK accuracy, but again, the baseline length is not provided - which I assume accounts for the difference. The SPS882 lists EVEREST™ multipath signal rejection technology, which dates back to the old 4000 series receivers. The R8 does not mention any use of EVEREST.

The main thing to note about the SPS882, is that while it lists all of the same abilities as the R8-3, it requires each option to be purchased separately. This allows the user to purchase only what they intend to use. Additional features can be added on at any time. As an example, if the user intends to use the SPS882 as a base station only - they can save about $9,000 over what a new R8-3 costs!
- Precise RTK is an option (optional low-precision mode available)
- Base station functionality is an option
- Rover functionality is an option
- Datalogging, Precision and TX (radio) are all options

* Galileo tracking is not mentioned on the specification sheets, but accoring to Trimble "the Trimble SPS882 is capable of tracking the experimental Galileo GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B test satellites for signal evaluation and test purposes"

 

R8 GNSS Model 3 Specifications:

REAL-TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) POSITIONING

R8 Model 3 Datasheet

R8 GNSS Notes:

The R8 Model 3 comes with all options enabled from the factory.

Per the product specification sheets, the R8-3 GNSS uses R-Track with Signal Prediction™ technology. R-Track is not mentioned on the 882 datasheet, but we believe both receivers use R-Track - as per this R-Track WhitePaper - is the technology Trimble developed in 2003 "in response to the DOD's announment of Modernization of GPS" which included L2C and L5 .

The internal radio offerings are different - the R8 GNSS offers two radio options - either an internal UHF radio, or GSM cellular modems, while the SPS882 offers three internal radio options - UHF, 900Mhz, or 2.4Ghz (wi-fi).


Equipment used for field test

Field test

Both receivers were tested in RTK mode at 12 km from the base station. The base station used for testing was a Trimble R8-3 GNSS sending CMRx™ corrections via TDL450H radio. We used Trimble Survey Controller ver 12.51 software loaded on a TSC2 for testing both rover receivers.

At the rover site, we used our 5" Trimble S6 instrument to compare deltas. For this test, we only concerned ourselves with RTK measurments that were outside the Horizontal and Vertical specifications.

We took several RTK observations over different times of the day. Receivers were tested in the same locations (side by side). We kept all observations under 20 seconds and compared measurements against our 5” Trimble S6 total station. As all RTK observations go, some are more accurate than others, but none measured out of specifications.

Both receivers were tested in several conditions: Wide open space, under light tree canopy, and in a parking lot – surrounded by several buildings that varied in height…a typical business park. Neither receiver fared better in any condition, nor at any distance within the 12 km baseline - and initialization times were within seconds of each other –The R8 did initialize faster almost every time – but within seconds the 882 was locked and ready.

Both of these receivers performed extremely well in every enviornment. To push our test further, we ventured into areas that had more tree canopy and other obstructions of the sky – including inside our covered warehouse, and up to the trunk of large - tall oak trees. Basically – areas not intended to be measured by satellite tracking devices.

The ability for either receiver to maintain it’s RTK fix was amazing – almost unbelievable in some cases, but the S6 was there to measure the truth and the truth is...

Summary

Our field test showed that both receivers performed flawlessly and simply got the job done. The choice seems to come down to your budget and intended use. The R8’s have every option you will ever need enabled from the factory, and the SPS882 allows you to purchase just the options you need. With all options enabled, the SPS882 is just under the price of an R8 (New list prices). However – if you option one 882 as a RTK rover and the other as a base station – you can save a considerable amount of money – over $10,000 per kit!

Resale value is the opposite. While the SPS882 was less expensive upfront, the R8 Model 3 has retained a higher resell value.

In the end, both receivers are solid products and provide the performance that you expect from Trimble. Either way you go, the clear winner is you.


Final notes

In order for our test receivers to work with either software, an option code was required for Survey Controller version 12.49 to operate the full set of features in the SPS882 receiver. This code was free of charge from Trimble. SCS900 version 2.9 software did not require any code to operate the R8 GNSS receiver. Additionally, Survey Controller 12.xx will start the SPS882 as a base station without the code – only requiring the code to use the SPS882 as a rover.

Testing was performed by Positioning Solutions for our own understanding of the product differences. Positioning Solutions in not affiliated with Trimble or any of its companies. Trimble R8, Survey Controller, SCS900, and SPS882 are registered trademarks of Trimble Navigation.

 

Return to www.PositioningSolutions.com website

Any comments? Let us know what you think - send us an email

 


1835 S. Macdonald
Mesa, AZ 85210
United States
P: (602) 695-2532